Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs denied acquittal or new trial ahead of sentencing

October 1, 2025 – Radio 854 Music News: 

Days before his sentencing, a U.S. federal judge has refused Sean “Diddy” Combs’ requests for a complete acquittal or a new trial — clearing the way for his upcoming punishment.

Background: What Happened at Trial

• In July 2025, a jury delivered a split verdict. Combs was acquitted on charges of racketeering and sex trafficking but convicted on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act.

• The convictions relate to allegations that Combs arranged so-called “freak off” events, involving drug-fueled sexual encounters with sex workers and ex-partners, some of whom testified that they felt coerced.

• Throughout the trial, prosecutors presented testimony, text messages, emails, and other documentary evidence to support their case.

Judge’s Decision: Why the Motions Were Denied

On September 30, Judge Arun Subramanian ruled against Combs’ defense motions, writing that the government had provided “overwhelming evidence” of guilt in regard to the prostitution convictions.

The judge noted that while Combs was not convicted on all counts, he cannot be re-tried or acquitted for crimes of which he was already convicted.

What’s at Stake: Sentencing

• Combs is scheduled to be sentenced on October 3, 2025.

• Prosecutors have recommended a prison term of 11 years and 3 months (135 months), citing the gravity of the crimes, Combs’ abuse of power, and the harm done to his victims.

• The defense is pushing back, seeking a sentence of no more than 14 months, arguing Combs has already spent significant time in custody and asserting mitigating factors.

• His time in jail at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center since his arrest in September 2024 is being factored into the defense’s plea.

Voices Heard: Victim Impact & Public Response

Casandra “Cassie” Ventura, Combs’ former partner and key witness in the trial, submitted a letter before sentencing urging the court to consider the lasting harm his conduct had on others.

Ventura described feeling manipulated, controlled, and fearful throughout their relationship, warning that if Combs were released lightly, it could discourage survivors from speaking out.

Prosecutors also emphasized that Combs has shown little remorse and repeatedly used his influence to silence or intimidate others — arguments they believe justify a stiff sentence.

What to Watch For

• Whether the judge accepts the prosecution’s recommendation or sides with the defense for a lighter sentence.

• How the judge weighs the impact statements and character evidence from both sides.

• Whether this ruling sets precedent for similar high-profile cases, especially involving power dynamics, coercion, and celebrity defendants.